Cases 31 - 40 of 45
v. Washington County, TN et al
as 2:2011cv00105
Defendant:
Washington County, TN, Washington County Sheriff's Department, Southern Health Partners, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fulghum v. Boyce et al
as 4:2010cv00063
Plaintiff:
Randall Edwin Fulghum
Defendant:
Randall Boyce, (f/n/u) Bear, (f/n/u) Cam and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fulghum v. Boyce et al
as 1:2010cv00077
Plaintiff:
Randall Edwin Fulghum
Defendant:
Randall Boyce, (f/n/u) Bear, (f/n/u) Cam and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fulghum v. Boyce et al
as 1:2010mc00013
Plaintiff:
Randall Edwin Fulghum
Defendant:
Randall Boyce, (f/n/u) Bear, (f/n/u) Cam and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00315
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Woods and Woods v. Tennessee State Employees Association et al
as 3:2010cv00452
Plaintiff:
Woods and Woods
Defendant:
Tennessee State Employees Association , John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Forster v. Little et al
as 2:2010cv02204
Defendant:
George M. Little, Henry Steward, Tommy Mills and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony D. Forster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wilhite v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 2:2009cv02196
Plaintiff:
Calvin Wilhite and Calvin Wilhite
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, State of Tennessee, Hardeman County Correctional Facilities Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Davis v. Axley et al
as 2:2008cv02683
Plaintiff:
Freddie L. Davis
Defendant:
Fred Axley, John Fowlkes, Joseph B. Dailey and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Davis v. Odell et al
as 2:2008cv02692
Plaintiff:
Freddie L. Davis
Defendant:
Patricia A. Odell, George H Brown, Sr., Tennessee, State Of and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
