Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Giles v. Jane Does 1-2
as 6:2024cv00370
Plaintiff:
Antonio Lamar Giles
Defendant:
Jane Does 1-2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Main Street America Protection Insurance Company v. Barry et al
as 1:2020cv03621
Defendant:
John Does 1-2, Korin Taylor, Scarlett Espinoza and others
Plaintiff:
Main Street America Protection Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Gregory v. United States of America et al
as 5:2018cv00381
Defendant:
John Doe 6, M. Chaney, John/Jane Does 10, 11 and others
Plaintiff:
Larry F. Gregory
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Christopher v. Dick's Sporting Goods Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv02656
Plaintiff:
Ed Christopher
Defendant:
Dick's Sporting Goods Inc. , CP Gal Kennesaw, LLC, George Bentley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bochner v. Martin County et al
as 2:2017cv14422
Plaintiff:
Neal H. Bochner
Defendant:
Martin County, Martin County Sheriff Office, William D. Snyder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clayton v. Murray, et al
as 6:2016cv00143
Plaintiff:
Ernest Clayton
Defendant:
Dennis Murray, Emmitt Donahue, Brian Chambers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mighty v. Miami-Dade County et al
as 1:2014cv23285
Plaintiff:
Trudy Mighty
Defendant:
Miami-Dade County , John and Jane Does 1-2 and Miami-Dade County Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chivers v. Keen et al
as 8:2012cv00178
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey John Chivers
Defendant:
Vernon L. Keen, Russell Park, Gary Deleandro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chivers v. Keen et al
as 2:2012cv00061
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey John Chivers
Defendant:
Vernon L. Keen, Russell Park, Gary Deleandro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Signature Pharmacy, Inc., et al
as 10-13248
Plaintiff - Appellant:
USA
Defendant - Appellee:
SIGNATURE PHARMACY, INC., JOHN DOE 1-15 and JANE DOE 1-2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
