Cases 21 - 30 of 674
Crispin v. State of Connecticut et al
as 3:2023cv01636
Plaintiff:
Jossean Crispin
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, D.M.H.A.S. Police, Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rosegreen v. Lloyd et al
as 3:2023cv01632
Plaintiff:
Lamont Rosegreen
Defendant:
Lloyd, Curney, Angel Quiros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dorlette v. City of Stamford et al
as 3:2023cv01589
Plaintiff:
Faroulh Dorlette
Defendant:
City of Stamford, Christopher Baker, John/Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Coleman v. Charles et al
as 3:2023cv01581
Plaintiff:
Charles W. Coleman
Defendant:
Sandra Charles, John Doe and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. State of Connecticut et al
as 3:2023cv01527
Plaintiff:
Gordon Clark
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, Office of Governor Ned Lamont, Ned Lamont and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gonzalez v. Quiros et al
as 3:2023cv01458
Plaintiff:
Luis Gonzalez
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Devonia Long, Rivera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howard v. Doe et al
as 3:2023cv01483
Plaintiff:
Jason Howard
Defendant:
John Doe, Jane Doe and Perez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. N.H. County Jail et al
as 3:2023cv01469
Plaintiff:
Darnell Walker
Defendant:
N.H. County Jail, District Administrator, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. UConn Health Dept of Otalaryngology et al
as 3:2023cv01439
Plaintiff:
Tyrrell Brown
Defendant:
UConn Health Dept of Otalaryngology, Jane Doe, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oh v. Quiros et al
as 3:2023cv01424
Plaintiff:
Bamm Oh
Defendant:
Angel Quiros and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
