Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Uber Technologies, Inc., et al. v. United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation
as 23-3445
Petitioner: UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., RASIER, LLC and RASIER-CA, LLC
Respondent: UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION
Not Classified By Court: JANE DOE LS 340, an individual, KATHERINE HYLIN, an individual, E. R., an individual and others
In re: Uber Technologies, Inc., Passenger Sexual Assault Litigation
as 3:2023md03084
Plaintiff: Jane Doe LSA 340, Katherine Hylin, E. R. and others
Defendant: Uber Technologies, Inc., Raiser, LLC, Raiser-CA, LLC and others
Petitioner: Bret Stanley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
LS 13 v. Uber Technologies, Inc., et al
as 3:2023cv03966
Plaintiff: Jane Doe LS 13
Defendant: Uber Technologies, Inc.,, Rasier, LLC and Rasier-CA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Estate of Emily Reardon, James Reardon Administrator v. Monsees et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv04029
Plaintiff: Estate of Emily Reardon, James Reardon Administrator
Defendant: James Monsees, Philip Morris USA Inc., Altria Enterprises LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rehms v. City of Post Falls Police Department, et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv00185
Plaintiff: Corrie M. Rehms
Defendant: Post Falls Police Department, City of Post Falls, City of Coeur d' Alene and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?