Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Lightheart v. The Salvation Army et al
as 3:2023cv00365
Plaintiff:
Terry Lightheart
Defendant:
The Salvation Army, The Salvation Army d/b/a The Salvation Army National Corporation, The Salvation Army d/b/a The Salvation Army USA Southern Territory and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Guyton et al v. Johnson et al
as 3:2021cv00452
Plaintiff:
Brad Guyton and Tonja Henderson
Defendant:
Carl R. Johnson, Jr., Amerimex USA, Inc., John/Jane Does 1-3 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00799
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Okpala v. Vasquez et al
as 5:2015cv00040
Plaintiff:
Okey Garry Okpala
Defendant:
FNU Vasquez, FNU Lacy, FNU Edwards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00228
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Patterson v. City of Forest, Mississippi et al
as 3:2014cv00657
Plaintiff:
Mark Patterson
Defendant:
City of Forest, Mississippi , Will Jones , Maggie Moore-Dixon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Skinner et al v. Bordages et al
as 1:2013cv00314
Plaintiff:
Jesse M. Skinner and Manuel E. Skinner, Jr.
Defendant:
John Bordages, Jr., Craig Shows, John Hawkins and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Combat Zone Corp. v. John/Jane Does 1-3
as 5:2012cv00140
Plaintiff:
Combat Zone Corp.
Defendant:
John/Jane Does 1-3
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011cv00083
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv00136
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
