Cases 1 - 10 of 4,596
Bure v. Gann et al
as 3:2024cv00362
Plaintiff:
Kevin James Bure
Defendant:
C Gann, Erin Williams, Smiley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plowman v. Baker et al
as 4:2024cv04080
Plaintiff:
Steven Plowman
Defendant:
Melissa Baker, Wexford Health Sources Inc, Bommiasami Veerasikku and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS v. FORESTAL et al
as 1:2024cv00415
Plaintiff:
JOHN ERIC THOMAS
Defendant:
KERRY J. FORESTAL, F. EMI and JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cornille v. Myers et al
as 3:2024cv01202
Defendant:
Administrative Review Board, William Loy, Percy Myers and others
Plaintiff:
Bradley J Cornille, Sr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rivers v. Paulsen et al
as 2:2024cv00519
Plaintiff:
Denzel Samonta Rivers
Defendant:
Heather Paulsen, Steven Johnson, Bradley Everson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Doe #1 et al
as 2:2024cv00505
Plaintiff:
Dominic Williams
Defendant:
Jane Doe #1, Jane Doe #2 and Jane Doe #3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sistrunk v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv03393
Plaintiff:
Ronnie M. Sistrunk
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Chicago Transit Authority, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ballance v. Illinois Department of Correction et al
as 3:2024cv03100
Plaintiff:
Kevas Ballance
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Correction, J.B. Pritzker, Latoya Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adam Titus v. Officer Thornton, et al
as 24-1714
Plaintiff:
ADAM TITUS
Defendant:
OFFICER THORNTON, Placement Officer, JOHN/JANE DOE, Maintenance Supervisor, WARDEN GOMEZ and others
Banks v. Ball et al
as 2:2024cv00253
Plaintiff:
Leon Banks
Defendant:
Denita R Ball, John Does and Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
