Cases 1 - 10 of 66
Jane Doe v. Nanos et al
as 4:2024cv00072
Defendant:
Unknown Party and Chris Nanos
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bastian #144716 v. Evans et al
as 2:2022cv01855
Plaintiff:
Thomas O Bastian
Defendant:
Rondald Evans, Betty Uliberri-Ruiz, R Silva and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doe v. Carisle et al
as 2:2021cv00137
Defendant:
Unknown Parties, Kevin Carisle and United States of America
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Doe v. United States of America
as 2:2021cv00132
Plaintiff:
Unknown Party and Jane Doe
Defendant:
Unknown Parties, Katrina Kane, Oscar Cortez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rodriguez v. Williams et al
as 2:2020cv00344
Defendant:
Unknown Fuller, Paul Penzone, Unknown Parties and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe v. United States of America et al
as 2:2017cv01991
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
United States of America, Edward Mendoza, Vanessa Mendoza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schmidt v. ADOC et al
as 2:2009cv01426
Plaintiff:
Frederick James Schmidt
Defendant:
ADOC, McDonald, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Townsel v. United States Bureau of Prisons et al
as 4:2009cv00371
Plaintiff:
Curtis Townsel
Defendant:
United States Bureau of Prisons, Jane Doe, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Stuart v. Maricopa County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2009cv01306
Plaintiff:
Wesley Paul Stuart
Defendant:
Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, Brown, Nyland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dias v. Frank et al
as 2:2009cv01168
Plaintiff:
John Dias
Defendant:
Clayton Frank, Hawaii, Department of Public Safety, Tommy Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
