Cases 1 - 9 of 9
TYSON v. COINBASE GLOBAL, INC. et al
as 1:2023cv22066
Plaintiff:
Sydney Tyson
Defendant:
COINBASE GLOBAL, INC., JOHN DOE, JANE DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
CARR v. COUNTY OF CAMDEN et al
as 1:2022cv03698
Plaintiff:
URSULA CARR
Defendant:
COUNTY CAMDEN, OFFICER SAMSON #1000, SERGEANT JANE DOE 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MORALES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2021cv12138
Defendant:
COUNTY OF CAMDEN, JOHN/JANE DOE 1, JOHN/JANE DOES 2-10 and others
Plaintiff:
NATASHA MORALES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
GAYDEN v. DIODATI et al
as 3:2018cv01101
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH A. GAYDEN
Defendant:
SERGEANT I DIODATI, NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE, TROOPERS JOHN DOES (1 & 2) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
BAKER v. CAMARILLO et al
as 3:2017cv12095
Plaintiff:
SCOTT BAKER
Defendant:
JOY CAMARILLO, IHUOMA NWACHUKWU, UNIVERSITY BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CARE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ATWELL v. OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER et al
as 3:2017cv00507
Plaintiff:
LUKE ATWELL
Defendant:
OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER, VERNON ESTREICHER, STATE OF NEW JERSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CONDE v. CITY OF ATLANTIC CITY et al
as 1:2014cv07531
Plaintiff:
RUBY CONDE
Defendant:
CITY OF ATLANTIC CITY, JOHN DOE OFFICER #1 and JOHN AND JANE DOES #2-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CIRILLI v. USAA CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2013cv04648
Plaintiff:
MARIA CIRILLI and MICHAEL CIRILLI
Defendant:
JANE DOE, JANE DOES 2-10, ABC CORPS. 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Breach of Contract- Insurance
OSHAUGHNESSY v. WALMART STORES, INC. et al
as 1:2007cv00960
Plaintiff:
SANDRA L. OSHAUGHNESSY
Defendant:
WALMART STORES, INC., WALMART STORES, INC., JOHN/JANE DOE #1 and others
Cross Claimant:
WALMART STORES, INC.
Cross Defendant:
JOHN/JANE DOE #1 and JOHN/JANE DOES 2-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
