Cases 31 - 40 of 57
WILF v. BUCKS COUNTY et al
as 2:2011cv04416
Plaintiff:
DANIEL A. WILF
Defendant:
BUCKS COUNTY , TERRANCE P. MOORE , JEFF MORRIETTI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRANGE v. COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY et al
as 2:2010cv03349
Plaintiff:
GLORIA MAE GRANGE
Defendant:
COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY , JULIO M. ALGARIN , NIKKI HOLLER, R.N. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DONNELLY v. KOLE et al
as 2:2010cv02682
Plaintiff:
TERENCE DONNELLY
Defendant:
EDWARD S. KOLE , KOLE PLASTIC SURGERY CENTER , JOHN DOE, M.D. #1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BAEZ v. NORTHAMPTON COUNTY et al
as 5:2008cv04327
Plaintiff:
LUIS G. BAEZ, SR.
Defendant:
NORTHAMPTON COUNTY, PRIMECARE MEDICAL, INC., SPRAGUE and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
LEWIS v. NORTHAMPTON COUNTY et al
as 5:2008cv04296
Plaintiff:
HASON L. LEWIS
Defendant:
NORTHAMPTON COUNTY, PRIMECARE MEDICAL, INC., SPRAGUE and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
KEARSE v. NOTHAMPTON COUNTY et al
as 5:2008cv03628
Plaintiff:
RONDEL J. KEARSE
Defendant:
NOTHAMPTON COUNTY, PRIMECARE MEDICAL, INC., WILLIAM SPRAGUE and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
MEUSA v. NORTHAMPTON COUNTY et al
as 5:2008cv03291
Plaintiff:
TROY A. MEUSA
Defendant:
NORTHAMPTON COUNTY, PRIMECARE MEDICAL , INC., WILLIAM SPRAGUE and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
HARRIS v. NORTHAMPTON COUNTY et al
as 5:2008cv03142
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN HARRIS
Defendant:
NORTHAMPTON COUNTY, PRIMECARE MEDICAL , INC., WILLIAM SPRAGUE and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
BARNER v. JOHN/JANE DOE (1-N) et al
as 2:2008cv02578
Plaintiff:
JAMES C. BARNER
Defendant:
JOHN/JANE DOE (1-N), FOX TELEVISION STATIONS OF PHILADELPHIA, INC. and JOHN/JANE ROE (1-N)
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
SANTIAGO v. NORTHAMPTON COUNTY et al
as 5:2008cv02167
Plaintiff:
RONALD G. SANTIAGO
Defendant:
NORTHAMPTON COUNTY, PRIMECARE MEDICAL, INC., WILLIAM SPRAGUE and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
