Cases 41 - 50 of 93
William Davis v. CXW, et al
as 16-11639
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM HOPE DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA, PEGGY ANN COOPER, Assistant Warden, JANE OR JOHN DOE and others
Davis v. City of Port Saint Lucie et al
as 2:2016cv14097
Plaintiff:
Trent A. Davis, Sr.
Defendant:
City of Port Saint Lucie , Rachel Renee Knaggs and Jane and John Does (1-10)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Toni Foudy, et al v. City of Fort Pierce, et al
as 15-15015
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TONI FOUDY
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF FORT PIERCE, JASON BRAUN and JANE AND JOHN DOES (1-10)
Mikell v. Mininger et al
as 1:2015cv02919
Plaintiff:
Joseph Mikell
Defendant:
SA Benjamin E. Mininger, SA Jordan Bensen, SA Carlos Morales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gatson v. Mininger et al
as 1:2015cv02331
Plaintiff:
Tokyo Gatson
Defendant:
Benjamin E. Mininger, Jordan Bensen, Carlos Morales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Bowden et al
as 8:2015cv01211
Plaintiff:
George Brown
Defendant:
Toni Bowden, Secretary, Department of Corrections, Hardee Correctional Institution and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gatson v. Mininger et al
as 1:2015cv01233
Plaintiff:
Daniel Gatson, Jr.
Defendant:
Benjamin E. Mininger, Jordan Bensen, Carlos Morales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen v. Mininger et al
as 1:2015cv01232
Plaintiff:
Belinda Allen
Defendant:
Benjamin E. Mininger, Jordan Bensen, Carlos Morales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gatson v. Mininger et al
as 1:2015cv01231
Plaintiff:
Tokyo Gatson
Defendant:
Benjamin E. Mininger, Jordan Bensen, Carlos Morales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hanks v. Mininger et al
as 1:2015cv01236
Plaintiff:
Pete Hanks
Defendant:
Benjamin E. Mininger, Jordan Bensen, Carlos Morales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
