Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Potthoff et al v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
as 4:2010cv01268
Defendant:
American Family Mutual Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Tony Potthoff and Janelle Potthoff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Barta v. Astrue
as 5:2010cv06082
Plaintiff:
Janelle Barta
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Earl v. State Farm Insurance Company
as 4:2009cv00206
Plaintiff:
Janel Earl
Defendant:
State Farm Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: Diversity
King v. Smith et al
as 4:2009cv00024
Plaintiff:
Matthew J. King
Defendant:
Connie Smith, Christopher Robert, April Osborn and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Blankenship et al v. Chamberlain et al
as 4:2008cv01168
Plaintiff:
Susan Blankenship, James Rolufs, Richie Giuffrida and others
Defendant:
Thomas J Chamberlain and Contemporary Carpet Contractors, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Johnson et al v. Nixon et al
as 6:2008cv03228
Plaintiff:
Glenn W. Johnson, Jr. and Alton Louis Vaughn, Sr.
Defendant:
Jeremiah (Jay) W Nixon, State of Missouri Attorney General Office, Ronald James Carrier and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now et al v. Scott et al
as 2:2008cv04084
Plaintiff:
Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now, Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now, Dionne O'Neal and others
Defendant:
Deborah E. Scott, Janel R Luck, Kansas City Board of Election Commissioners and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Anderson v. Bailey et al
as 4:2007cv01627
Plaintiff:
Woodrow Anderson
Defendant:
Gary Bailey and Janel R. Luck
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Suttenfield v. Luck
as 2:2007cv04090
Plaintiff:
Germaine Suttenfield
Defendant:
Janel Luck
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Suttenfield v. Luck
as 2:2007cv04081
Plaintiff:
Germaine Suttenfield
Defendant:
Janel Luck
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
