Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Tucson Medical Center v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Incorporated et al
as 4:2022cv00024
Defendant:
Actavis Pharma Incorporated, Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Incorporated, Cephalon Incorporated and others
Plaintiff:
Tucson Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Tucson Medical Center v. Purdue Pharma LP et al
as 4:2019cv00358
Defendant:
Purdue Frederick Company Incorporated, Purdue Pharma LP, Abbott Laboratories and others
Plaintiff:
Tucson Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Prescott, City of v. Allergan PLC et al
as 3:2019cv08165
Defendant:
Actavis Incorporated, Purdue Frederick Company Incorporated, Beverly Sackler and others
Plaintiff:
Prescott, City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Tucson, City of v. Purdue Pharma LP et al
as 4:2019cv00167
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma LP, Mallinckrodt LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Tucson, City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Pima, County of v. Purdue Pharma LP et al
as 4:2019cv00166
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma LP, Mallinckrodt LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Pima, County of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Tucson Medical Center v. Purdue Pharma LP et al
as 4:2018cv00532
Defendant:
Purdue Frederick Company Incorporated, Purdue Pharma LP, Abbott Laboratories and others
Plaintiff:
Tucson Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Stroud v. Janssen Research & Development, LLC et al
as MIE/2:14-cv-14798
Plaintiff:
Betty Stroud , Raymond J Geiman and Rosann Lynn Chapo
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development LLC , Johnson and Johnson Pharmaceutical Research and Development, L. L. C., Janssen Ortho, LLC and others
Khami v. Ortho-McNeil Neurologics, Incorporated et al
as 2:2009cv11464
Plaintiff:
Christine Khami
Defendant:
Ortho-McNeil Neurologics, Incorporated, Johnson and Johnson Services, Incorporated, Ortho-McNeil Neurologics and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
