Cases 1 - 10 of 16
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv18934
Plaintiff:
JARVIS JOHNSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv08636
Plaintiff:
JARVIS JOHNSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Clervain et al v. Hughs et al
as 4:2022mc00612
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervain and Niva Guerrier
Defendant:
Ruth R. Hughs, Lizzie Pannill Fletcher, Al Green and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Filed in Error
as 4:2022mc01094
Plaintiff:
Incorrectly Filed
Defendant:
Ruth R. Hughs, Lizzie Pannill Fletcher, Al Green and others
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Incorrectly filed. Open MC 4:22mc00612
as 4:2022cv01094
Plaintiff:
Incorrectly Filed
Defendant:
Ruth R. Hughs, Lizzie Pannill Fletcher, Al Green and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Smith v Robertson Unit Administration et al
as 1:2021cv00220
Plaintiff:
Jason Ray Smith
Defendant:
Robertson Unit Administration, Jennifer S Cozby, Penny K Dickerson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Taylor et al
as 1:2021cv00219
Plaintiff:
Jason Ray Smith
Defendant:
Myisha S Taylor, Christian Mancha, Greg A Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson et al v. Abbott et al
as 1:2021cv00690
Plaintiff:
Senfronia Thompson, Trey Martinez Fischer, Gene Wu and others
Defendant:
Gregory Wayne Abbott, Dade Phelan and James White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv76122
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JARVIS JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. USA
as 1:2018cv00376
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Jarvis Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
