Cases 1 - 10 of 102
Ezell v. Hininger, et al
as 23-7007
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES RICKY EZELL, III
Defendant / Appellee:
DAMON HININGER, CEO of Core Civic, JAMES YATES, Warden, Davis Correctional Facility, DEPUTY WARDEN GENTRY and others
Ezell v. Hininger, et al
as 22-7024
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES RICKY EZELL, III
Defendant / Appellee:
DAMON HININGER, CEO of Core Civic, JAMES YATES, Warden, Davis Correctional Facility, DEPUTY WARDEN GENTRY and others
Davis v. Stitt et al
as 5:2022cv00302
Plaintiff:
Ezekiel Davis
Defendant:
Kevin Stitt, Amber Martin, Mark Bowen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clervrain et al v. Lankford et al
as 5:2022cv00283
Plaintiff:
Biglauwick Plaisimond, Manetirony Clervrain, Wesline Casir and others
Defendant:
James Lankford, Jim Inhofe, Stephanie Bice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis v. GEO Group, et al
as 21-6099
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EZEKIEL DAVIS
Defendant / Appellee:
GEO GROUP, INC., MARK BOWEN, Warden, RITA HOOD, Major and others
Davis v. GEO Group Inc et al
as 5:2021cv00577
Defendant:
Wellpath Inc, FNU Smith, Rita Hood and others
Plaintiff:
Ezekiel Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Claudio v. Bates et al
as 5:2021cv00071
Defendant:
J Kevin Stitt, Mark Knutson, FNU Bowen and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Anibal Claudio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Claudio v. Bates et al
as 5:2020cv01216
Defendant:
J Kevin Stitt, Mark Knutson, FNU Bowen and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Anibal Claudio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bellis v. Bryant
as 20-6164
Respondent / Appellee:
JASON BRYANT
Petitioner / Appellant:
STACY GENE BELLIS
Scott v. Hormel, et al
as 20-6130
Defendant / Appellee:
BETSY HORMEL, CHSA-Medical in official and individual capacity, JOE ALLBAUGH, Director of Department of Corrections in official and individual capacity, KELLI CURRY, Food Service Manager III in official and individual capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRIAN TYRONE SCOTT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
