Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Larry Smith v. Sydney Wallace, et al
as 16-3240
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Larry Lee Smith
Defendant - Appellee:
Sydney Wallace, James F. Kanatzar, Jeffrey Gedbaw and others
Todd Luh v. Missouri Department of Mental, et al
as 15-3307
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Todd James Luh
Defendant - Appellee:
Missouri Department of Mental Health, Dr. Jason Cafer, Dr. David Hunter and others
Larry Smith v. Sydney Wallace, et al
as 15-2715
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Larry Lee Smith
Defendant - Appellee:
Sydney Wallace, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, James F. Kanatzar, Prosecuting Attorney, Michael W. Hanna, Judge and others
Luh v. Missouri Department of Mental Health et al
as 2:2015cv04112
Plaintiff:
Todd James Luh
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Mental Health , Jason Cafer , David Hunter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vance Moller v. Richard Doisy, et al
as 15-1628
Petitioner - Appellant:
Vance Ray Moller
Defendant - Appellee:
Dr. Richard Doisy and Dr. Jason Cafer
Holtcamp v. Loehr et al
as 2:2014cv04313
Plaintiff:
Jackie L Holtcamp
Defendant:
Colleen Loehr and Jason Cafer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vance Moller v. Richard Doisy, et al
as 13-3790
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Vance Ray Moller
Defendant - Appellee:
Richard Doisy, Dr. and Jason Cafer, Dr.
Smith v. Wallace et al
as 4:2013cv01205
Plaintiff:
Larry Lee Smith
Defendant:
Sydney Wallace, James F Kanatzar, Jeffrey Gedbaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Wallace et al
as 4:2013cv02464
Plaintiff:
Larry Lee Smith
Defendant:
Sydney Wallace, James F. Kanatzar, Jeffrey Gedbaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Larry Smith v. Ted Hunt, et al
as 13-3207
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Larry Lee Smith
Defendant - Appellee:
Ted R. Hunt, Jackson County Prosecuting Attorney, Robin Threlkeld, Jackson County Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, Robert F. Booth, Police Officer and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
