Civil Rights Cases
Kokinda v. Koch Industries, Inc et al
as 2:2018cv00095
Plaintiff: Jason Kokinda
Defendant: Koch Industries, Inc, Phil Scott, Thomas J. Donovan, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jason Kokinda v. Koch Industries Inc, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 18-1272
Plaintiff - Appellant: JASON KOKINDA
Defendant - Appellee: KOCH INDUSTRIES INC, official capacity, TOM WOLF, personal capacity, WILLIAM R. STOYCOS, personal capacity and others
Kokinda v. Koch Industries Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv01531
Plaintiff: Jason Kokinda
Defendant: Koch Industries Inc., Tom Wolf, William R. Stoycos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kokinda v. Koch Industries, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv00098
Plaintiff: Jason Kokinda
Defendant: Koch Industries, Inc., Burlington Police, Phil Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jason Kokinda v. Pennsylvania Department of Cor, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-1584
Plaintiff - Appellant: JASON KOKINDA
Defendant - Appellee: PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, M. H. DIGGS, (official/personal capacity), CHRISTOPHER H. OPPMAN, MBA, MHA (official/personal capacity) and others
Defendant - Appellant: PRISON HEALTH SERVICES INC, (offical/personal capacity)
KOKINDA v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv00005
Plaintiff: JASON KOKINDA
Defendant: PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, RHONDA HOUSE, SHELLY A. MANKEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
KOKINDA v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv01593
Plaintiff: JASON KOKINDA
Defendant: PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, MICHELE HOWARD DIGGS, CHRISTOPHER H. OPPMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?