Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Luttrell et al v. Hardeman County
as 1:2024cv01105
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Luttrell, Jason McCord and Chadriques Wooden
Defendant:
Tennessee Hardeman County
MCCORD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv61324
Plaintiff:
JASON MCCORD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCCORD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv12695
Plaintiff:
JASON MCCORD
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCCORD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv24133
Plaintiff:
JASON MCCORD
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Randolph v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2015cv00822
Plaintiff:
Tommy Randolph
Defendant:
Joseph M Arpaio, Maricopa County, Maricopa County Jails and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jason Patten v. Charles Stone, et al
as 14-15542
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JASON MCCORD PATTEN
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES FRANK STONE, D.D.S., F. KIANI, D.D.S., W. KUSHNER, III, D.D.S. and others
Jason Patten v. C. Clark, et al
as 13-57067
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JASON MCCORD PATTEN
Defendant - Appellee:
C. CLARK, R.N., T. BRISCO, D.A., LEE, Dr., DDS and others
McCord et al v. Merck & Co, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv03925
Plaintiff:
Jason McCord
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc. and Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
McCord et al v. Merck & Co, Inc. et al
as NYE/1:13-cv-03925
Plaintiff:
Jason McCord
Defendant:
Merck & Co. , Inc. and Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Keune et al v. Merck & Co, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv02049
Plaintiff:
Richard L. Ames, Lee N. Barber, Andrew Benincasa and others
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc. and Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
