Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Jason Williams v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2023cv08425
Plaintiff:
JASON WILLIAMS
Defendant:
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES and Does 1-10 Inclusive
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jason William Brokken v. Kathleen Allison et al
as 5:2022cv01526
Petitioner:
Jason William Brokken
Respondent:
Kathleen Allison and Ken Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC)Brokken v. Allison et al
as 1:2022cv01084
Petitioner:
Jason William Brokken
Respondent:
Kathleen Allison and Ken Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
No on 878 et al v. Washington County et al
as 3:2022cv00928
Plaintiff:
No on 878, Jonathan Polonsky, Brent Chadwick and others
Defendant:
Washington County and Patrick Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA v. Jason Sadler
as 21-30277
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JASON WILLIAM SADLER, AKA Dustin Jay Sweeney
Jason William Bronson v. Kilolo Kijakazi
as 5:2021cv01635
Plaintiff:
Jason William Bronson
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Peter Kagel v. Jay Raftery, et al
as 20-17351
Defendant / Appellee:
THOMAS EDWIN BEACH, LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP, JAY LAURENCE RAFTERY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PETER KAGEL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv01721
Counter Claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Kagel v. Raftery et al
as 3:2020cv05809
Defendant:
Jason W Mauck, Cowdrey, Melissa T Daugherty and others
Plaintiff:
Peter Kagel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
USA v. William Blessett
as 19-10351
Defendant / Appellant:
WILLIAM LAMAR BLESSETT, AKA Jason William Blessett
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
