Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Estrada-Cervantes v. Garland
as 21-689
Petitioner:
JAVIER ESTRADA-CERVANTES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Estrada v. Quality Carriers, Inc. et al
as 5:2021cv00105
Plaintiff:
Javier Francisco Estrada and Francisco Javier Estrada
Defendant:
Quality Carriers, Inc. and Miguel Ambros
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
QFS Transportation, LLC v. Estrada Transport Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00092
Plaintiff:
QFS Transportation, LLC
Defendant:
Estrada Transport Group, Inc., Knight Express Inc. and Javier Estrada, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Estrada v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 3:2020cv00209
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Petitioner:
Francisco Javier Estrada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jackson et al v. Intercontinental Terminals Company LLC Do not docket in this case. Case is consolidated under 4:19-cv-01460.
as 4:2020cv00216
Plaintiff:
Brenda Sheppard, Joan Mason, Brenda McDaniel and others
Defendant:
Intercontinental Terminals Company LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Estrada v. Kingsbridge Marketplace Corp. et al
as 1:2017cv09890
Plaintiff:
Javier Estrada
Defendant:
Kingsbridge Marketplace Corp., Vernon Marketplace, Inc. and Esmail Mobarak
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
USA v. Francisco Estrada
as 15-51246
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
FRANCISCO JAVIER ESTRADA, also known as Paco
USA v. Francisco Estrada
as 15-51185
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
FRANCISCO JAVIER ESTRADA, also known as Paco
Javier Estrada v. National Life Group, et al
as 2:2015cv08647
Defendant:
Does, Life Insurance Company of the Southwest and National Life Group
Plaintiff:
Javier Estrada
Javier Estrada v. National Life Group, et al
as 5:2015cv02288
Defendant:
Does, Life Insurance Company of the Southwest and National Life Group
Plaintiff:
Javier Estrada
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
