Cases 1 - 10 of 10
JENSEN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv12181
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAY JENSEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bry v. Jensen et al
as 1:2020cv00605
Plaintiff:
Anita Bry
Defendant:
Jay Jensen and Rummel's Oilfield Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jensen v. United States of America
as 2:2018cv00993
Plaintiff:
Jay Jensen
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Jensen v. United States of America
as 2:2018cv00268
Defendant:
John G Bitsko and United States of America
Plaintiff:
Jay Jensen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (
Baker v. Jensen et al
as 2:2017cv00141
Plaintiff:
Charles Baker
Defendant:
Darren Jay Jensen, Mark R. Jaggi, Michael A. Beindorff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hansen v. Jensen et al
as 2:2017cv00075
Plaintiff:
Rob Hansen
Defendant:
Darren Jay Jensen, Mark R. Jaggi, Michael A. Beindorff and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109
In Re: Lifevantage Corporation Securities Litigation
as 2:2016cv00965
Plaintiff:
Jun Zhang
Defendant:
Lifevantage , Darren Jay Jensen and Mark R. Jaggi
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0078
Fuller, et al v. Davis, et al
as 14-4036
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID FULLER, Grandparent and RUTH M. FULLER, Grandparent
Defendant - Appellee:
LYNN W. DAVIS, Honorable Judge, in his official and individual capacity, MARY NOONAN, Honorable Judge, in her official and individual capacity, JAY JENSEN, Dr. of ACAFS, (a/k/a the Family Academy) and others
Fuller et al v. Bartholomew et al
as 2:2013cv00375
Plaintiff:
David Fuller and Ruth M. Fuller
Defendant:
Lynn W. Davis , Mary Noonan , Jay Jensen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jensen v. Quarterman
as 1:2008cv00080
Petitioner:
Jimmy Jay Jensen
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
