Cases 1 - 10 of 1,197
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01507
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01505
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
Heckl et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 1:2024cv03918
Defendant:
The 3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co., AGC Chemicals Americas Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Heckl, Robert Henrickson, Thomas Hensley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal - Suit against Federal Officer
Simon, et al. v. Crouchaine, et al.
as 24-3212
Plaintiff:
RONALD P. SIMON and TERESA J. SIMON
Defendant:
JAYN CROUCHAINE, DORIS STRAND and WAYNE JANKE
Simon, et al. v. Crouchaine, et al.
as 24-3213
Plaintiff:
RONALD P. SIMON and TERESA J. SIMON
Defendant:
JAYN CROUCHAINE, DORIS STRAND and WAYNE JANKE
RODGERS v. CUMBERLAND COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2024cv06202
Plaintiff:
EVAN RODGERS
Defendant:
CUMBERLAND COUNTY JAIL, EUGENE CALDWELL, II, CHARLES WARREN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KONATA v. RAMOS et al
as 2:2024cv01902
Plaintiff:
MATTHEWS KONATA
Defendant:
RAMOS, ABDUR-RAZZAQ, HOSKINSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03333
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Psaila v. American Express Company, et al.
as 24-2580
Defendant:
ERIKA GIRARDI, AMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY, Erika Jayne and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER PSAILA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00995
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
