Cases 11 - 20 of 27
Bales v. Corizon Medical Services Inc. et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2016cv00714
Plaintiff:
David H. Bales
Defendant:
Corizon Medical Services Inc., Jean Darbouze, Jefferson S. Dunn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas Jones v. Corizon, et al
as 15-14003
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS EDWARD JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
CORIZON, Medical Service Provider, JEAN DARBOUZE, Dr., MS. WILSON, Director of Nursing and others
Hickman v. Jones et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2015cv00352
Plaintiff:
Edward Philpot Hickman
Defendant:
Karla Jones, Luther Strange, Kim Tobias Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. Darbouze et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2014cv00215
Plaintiff:
Gregory Kenneth Lee
Defendant:
Jean Darbouze , Kay Wilson , Mrs. Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Thomas et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2013cv00905
Plaintiff:
Eric Lee Brown
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas , Kenneth Sconyers and Jean Darbouze
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Luker v. Corizon Health Services et al
as 4:2013cv01568
Plaintiff:
Clarence Luker
Defendant:
Corizon Health Services, Jean Darbouze, Anissa Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Conley v. Darbouze et al (INMATE 1)(CONSENT)
as 2:2013cv00583
Plaintiff:
Roger Glen Conley
Defendant:
Jean Darbouze , Kenneth Sconyers and Kim Tobias Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Darbouze et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2013cv00287
Plaintiff:
Gregory Kenneth Lee
Defendant:
Jean Darbouze, Mrs. Wilson, Mrs. Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Corizon et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2013cv00135
Plaintiff:
Terry Davis
Defendant:
Corizon, Louis Boyd, Jean Darbouze and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flie v. Darbouze et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2012cv01074
Plaintiff:
Maxson Flie
Defendant:
Jean Darbouze and Gary Hetzel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
