Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Booker v. Supreme Court of South Carolina et al
as 2:2016cv00058
Plaintiff:
Patrick L Booker
Defendant:
Supreme Court of South Carolina, Jean H Toal, Costa Pleicones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. McMaster et al
as 3:2015cv02177
Plaintiff:
Samuel N Smith
Defendant:
Henry D McMaster, Jean H Toal, Rick Quinn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Smith v. Toal et al
as 3:2014cv00507
Plaintiff:
Samuel N Smith
Defendant:
Jean H Toal, Rick Quinn, T Stephen Lynch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Assa'ad-Faltas v. City of Columbia et al
as 3:2014cv00298
Plaintiff:
Marie Assa'ad-Faltas
Defendant:
City of Columbia, Citys Police Department, The, Jean H Toal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gaddy v. South Carolina Supreme Court's District of Columbia et al
as 8:2013cv02541
Plaintiff:
Calvin Lyndale Gaddy
Defendant:
South Carolina Supreme Court's District of Columbia and Jean H Toal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Assa'ad-Faltas v. Wilson et al
as 3:2011cv00278
Plaintiff:
Marie Assa'ad-Faltas
Defendant:
Alan Wilson, Glenn McConnell and Jean H Toal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fieger v. Supreme Court of South Carolina et al
as 3:2010cv01038
Plaintiff:
Geoffrey N Fieger
Defendant:
Supreme Court of South Carolina, Jean H Toal and John W Kittredge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv03148
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Rochester v. Rosemond et al
as 2:2009cv01809
Plaintiff:
Julian E Rochester
Defendant:
E Delane Rosemond, Mark Sanford, United States Government and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Clemons v. Bradley et al
as 6:2007cv03286
Plaintiff:
Clayton Clemons
Defendant:
J N Bradley, Chris Scalzo, C R Garrett and others
ThirdParty Defendant:
Henry McMaster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
