Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Jones v. Woodford
as 3:2010cv01015
Petitioner:
Edward Jones
Respondent:
Jeanne Woodford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dawkins v. Woodford et al
as 3:2009cv01053
Defendant:
D Gonzalez, Jeanne Woodford, T Ochoa and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony D Dawkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Marcus Eduardo Mendiola v. Jeanne Woodford
as 3:2009cv01442
Petitioner:
Marcos Eduardo Mendiola
Respondent:
Jeanne Woodford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hayes v. Dovey et al
as 3:2009cv01016
Plaintiff:
Dontay D Hayes
Defendant:
John Dovey, Jeanne Woodford, J G Giurbino and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alejandre v. Woodford et al
as 3:2008cv00093
Plaintiff:
Manuel Cabrera Alejandre
Defendant:
Jeanne Woodford, John Marshall, Robert L Ayers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hearod v. Giurbino et al
as 3:2007cv01319
Plaintiff:
Willie Hearod
Defendant:
Giurbino, Charles Pickett, John Parsons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lane v. Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2007cv01148
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Lane
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Jeanne Woodford and State Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCornell v. Cruz et al
as 3:2007cv00199
Plaintiff:
Dennis A McCornell
Defendant:
Cruz, Brown, Crawford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norwood v. Woodford et al
as 3:2007cv00057
Plaintiff:
Gregory Lynn Norwood
Defendant:
Jeanne Woodford, M E Bourland, J A Giurbino and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v Woodford
as 3:2006cv02314
Petitioner:
Travis Ray Thompson
Respondent:
Jeanne Woodford, Jeanne Woodford and Bill Lockyer
Defendant:
Scott Kernan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
