Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Krueger, et al v. Orr, et al
as 24-7037
Plaintiff:
JOHN KRUEGER, individually and as Co-Administrator of the Estate of Jeffery Krueger and PAMELA KRUEGER, individually and as Co-Administrator of the Estate of Jeffery Krueger
Defendant:
NICHOLAS ORR, individually, DREW CRAIG, individually, TYLER MCFARLAND, individually and others
Krueger, et al v. Phillips, et al
as 24-7035
Plaintiff:
JOHN KRUEGER, individually and as Co-Administrator of the Estate of Jeffery Krueger and PAMELA KRUEGER, individually and as Co-Administrator of the Estate of Jeffery Krueger
Defendant:
KALEB PHILLIPS, individually, NICHOLAS ORR, individually, MATTHEW LOTT, individually and others
Krueger et al v. Wagoner County Board of County Commissioners et al
as 6:2021cv00044
Defendant:
Wagoner County Board of County Commissioners, Wagoner Emergency Services, Inc., Wagoner County, Oklahoma and others
Plaintiff:
Pamela Krueger and John Krueger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00706
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv04060
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Franklin Smith, et al v. Jeff Patterson
as 10-1299
Plaintiff - Appellee:
FRANKLIN SMITH, BRANDON PANNELL, CLIFFORD COLLINS, JR., Next friend of CC, a minor and others
Plaintiff - Appellant Cross-Appellee:
DEVIN PLUMMER
Defendant - Appellant:
JOHN MACDONALD, MICHAEL LIVIDINI, STEVEN SCHWEIN and others
Defendant - Appellant Cross-Appellee:
JEFF PATTERSON
Franklin Smith, et al v. Jeff Patterson
as 10-1228
Plaintiff - Appellee:
FRANKLIN SMITH, BRANDON PANNELL, CLIFFORD COLLINS, JR., Next friend of CC, a minor and others
Defendant - Appellant:
JEFF PATTERSON, JOHN MACDONALD, MICHAEL LIVIDINI and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
