Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Mumin v. Kelly et al
as 8:2017cv00099
Defendant:
Jeffre Cheuvront, Joe Kelly, Lancaster County Sheriff and others
Plaintiff:
Dukhan Mumin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mumin v. Frakes et al
as 4:2017cv03032
Defendant:
Todd Bahensky, Steena Beltz, Valorie Benedixen and others
Plaintiff:
Dukhan Mumin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Epp et al v. Frakes et al
as 4:2016cv03176
Defendant:
Todd Bahensky, Steena Beltz, Valorie Benedixen and others
Plaintiff:
William Epp and Dukhan Mumin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Cheuvront
as 4:2016cv03043
Defendant:
Jeffre Cheuvront
Plaintiff:
Maurice Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
James v. Cheuvront
as 4:2013cv03207
Respondent:
Jeffre Cheuvront
Petitioner:
Brandon James
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomas Zakrzewski v. United States, et al
as 10-2613
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Thomas R. Zakrzewski
Defendant - Appellee:
United States, United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, United States District Court for the District of Nebraska and others
Zakrzewski v. United States et al
as 8:2010cv00195
Defendant:
Kenneth C. Stephan, John F. Wright, Dan Fullner and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas R. Zakrzewski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bethany Bowen v. Honorable Jeffre Cheuvront
as 07-3487
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Bethany V. Bowen
Defendant - Appellee:
Honorable Jeffre Cheuvront, in his official capacity as Justice of the District Court for the State of Nebraska
Amicus On Behalf Of Appellant:
North Dakota State's Attorneys Association, North Dakota State's Attorneys Association
Bowen v. Cheuvront
as 4:2007cv03221
Plaintiff:
Bethany V. Bowen, Bethany V. Bowen and Bethany V. Bowen
Defendant:
Jeffre Cheuvront
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
