Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 41
Quarmon v. Dillman
as 2:2015cv00210
Plaintiff: Benjamin K Quarmon
Defendant: Jeffrey Dillman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grove v. Dillman
as 2:2015cv00114
Defendant: Mathew D. Grove and Jeffrey Dillman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grove v. Dillman
as 2:2015cv00096
Plaintiff: Mathew D. Grove
Defendant: Jeffrey Dillman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clarence Roulhac, Jr. v. Harold Clarke We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-7815
Plaintiff - Appellant: CLARENCE ROULHAC, JR.
Defendant - Appellee: HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director VDOC, LINDA SHIELDS, F.S. Dir. VDOC, CARL MARROW, Reg. F.S. Dir. VDOC and others
Roulhac v. McDonnell et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2013cv00848
Plaintiff: Clarence Roulhac, Jr.
Defendant: R. McDonnell, Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, II, Harold W. Clarke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murray v. Dillman
as 1:2013cv01261
Petitioner: Kenneth Murray
Respondent: Jeffrey Dillman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Richard Sears v. Jeffrey Dillman We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-6835
Petitioner - Appellant: RICHARD WAYNE SEARS
Respondent - Appellee: JEFFREY DILLMAN, Warden
Tippens v. McDonnell et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2013cv00257
Plaintiff: Robert Earl Tippens, Jr.
Defendant: Robert McDonnell, Harold W. Clarke and Jeffrey Dillman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roulhac v. Clarke et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2013cv00049
Plaintiff: Clarence Roulhac, Jr.
Defendant: Harold W. Clarke, Linda Shields, Carl Marrow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sears v. Dillman We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv00942
Petitioner: Richard Wayne Sears
Respondent: Jeffrey Dillman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?