Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Pierre-Louis v. N.Y.C. Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2012cv02958
Defendant:
City of New York, N.Y.C. Department of Corrections and Officer John Doe
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Pierre-Louis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pierre-Louis v. N.Y.C. Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2012cv02240
Defendant:
City of N.Y., N.Y.C. Department of Corrections and Officer Martinez
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Pierre-Louis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Weymouth et al v. Hughes et al
as 3:2010cv01039
Plaintiff:
Daniel Anthony Weymouth, Patrick J. Simpson, Jonathan Lee Riches and others
Defendant:
Amanda Hughes, Kristen Hungness, Natalie Riley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jonathan Riches v. Horse Illustrated, et al
as 10-13952
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Movant - Appellant:
PATRICK J. SIMPSON, MARIO ALVARADO, GEORGE BARBOUR and others
Defendant - Appellee:
HORSE ILLUSTRATED, d.b.a. Bowtie Magazines, BOWTIE, INC., NORMAN RIDKER and others
Weymouth et al v. Hughes et al
as 3:2010mc00106
Plaintiff:
Daniel Anthony Weymouth, Patrick J. Simpson, Jonathan Lee Riches and others
Defendant:
Amanda Hughes, Kristen Hungness, Natalie Riley and others
Riches et al v. Hungness et al
as 5:2010cv00279
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches, Richard Gulietti, Daniel Anthony Weymouth and others
Defendant:
Kristen Hungness, Amanda Hughes, Natalie Riley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Riches et al v. Hungness et al
as 2:2010cv00264
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches, Richard Gulietti, Daniel Anthony Weymouth and others
Defendant:
Kristen Hungness, Amanda Hughes, Natalie Riley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pittman et al v. Gulf Stream Coach, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv01282
Plaintiff:
Angela Pittman , Keisha LebLanc , Kevin Ruffin and others
Defendant:
Gulf Stream Coach, Inc., Fluor Enterprises, Inc. and Shaw Environmental, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
