Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Dillon et al v. United States of America et al
as 0:2022cv00126
Plaintiff:
Richard Dillon and Bonnie Dillon
Defendant:
United States, Charles Rettig, L Terra and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Jeffrey Turner v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC, et al
as 20-3076
Defendant / Appellee:
MIKE RAISOR AUTOMOTIVE GROUP, INC., MERCEDES-BENZ USA, LLC, MIKE RAISOR BUICK GMC CADILLAC, INC., doing busniess as MERCEDES-BENZ OF LAFAYETTE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEFFREY TURNER
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv21665
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Cunningham v. Advanced Tele-genetic Counseling, LLC et al
as 4:2020cv00143
Defendant:
Speciality Drug Testing, LLC, Elizabeth Turner, Advanced Tele-genetic Counseling, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Craig Cunningham
Klein v. Turner
as 2:2019cv00767
Defendant:
Jeffrey Turner
Plaintiff:
R. Wayne Klein
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1367
Vodicka et al v. North American Title Company et al
as 1:2012cv00768
Plaintiff:
Steven Aubrey and Brian Vodicka
Third Party Defendant:
Peter Barlin, CFS Associates, Inc., Sandra Gunn and others
Third Party Plaintiff:
North American Title Company
Defendant:
North American Title Company, Jeffrey Turner, Lesley Karen Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Vodicka et al v. North American Title Company et al
as 3:2012cv02721
Defendant:
North American Title Company , Lesley Karen Williams , Jeffrey Turner and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Vodicka and Steven Aubrey
Thirdparty_defendant:
Sandra Gunn , Gregory Lahr , CFS Associates Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00085
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Type:
Other Statutes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
