Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Taylor v. State of Alaska, Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2026cv00192
Plaintiff:
Made Allen Taylor
Defendant:
State of Alaska, Department of Corrections, Jen Winkelman, Jake Wyckoff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Schmidt et al
as 3:2026cv00069
Plaintiff:
Made Allen Taylor
Defendant:
Delila Schmidt, Jen Winkelman, Stephen J. Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pete v. State of Alaska et al
as 2:2026cv00001
Plaintiff:
Barbara Pete
Defendant:
State of Alaska, Department of Corrections, Jen Winkelman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Blalock v. Winkelman
as 3:2025cv00262
Petitioner:
Yoder Austin Blalock
Respondent:
Jen Winkelman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Blalock v. Winkelman
as 3:2025cv00250
Petitioner:
Yoder Austin Blalock
Respondent:
Jen Winkelman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bradshaw v. Dahlstrom, et al.
as 25-4165
Plaintiff:
RYAN BRADSHAW
Defendant:
NANCY DAHLSTROM, in her individual capacity and JEN WINKELMAN, in her individual capacity
Downard v. Winkelman
as 3:2025cv00059
Petitioner:
Jason Downard
Respondent:
Jen Winkelman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bradshaw v. Dahlstrom et al
as 3:2024cv00266
Defendant:
Nancy Dahlstrom and Jen Winkelman
Plaintiff:
Ryan Bradshaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lee v. Winkelman
as 24-5625
Respondent:
JEN WINKELMAN, acting Commissioner, Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
LAUREL LEE
Hall et al v. State of Alaska, Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
Brian Hall and Richard R. Blevins
Defendant:
State of Alaska, Department of Corrections and Jen Winkelman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
