Cases 1 - 10 of 430
Seelig v. Ramsey County, Minnesota et al
as 0:2024cv01732
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Seelig
Defendant:
Ramsey County, Minnesota, Inmate Services Corporation, Rogeric Hankins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Boeckelman v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01627
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Boeckelman
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv01428
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Somers v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01185
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Somers
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Breczinski v. O'Malley
as 0:2024cv01001
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Breczinski
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv00944
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Shawgo et al v. Counter Brands LLC et al
as 0:2024cv00556
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Shawgo, Jennifer Shawgo BC LLC, Molly Bjornlie and others
Defendant:
Counter Brands, LLC a California limited liability company doing business as Beautycounter and Carlyle Group Inc., The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Tennin v. Torres et al
as 0:2024cv00464
Plaintiff:
Todd Tennin
Defendant:
Torres, Dan Minke, Jessica Fergen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Duenes v. MN Prairie County Alliance et al
as 0:2024cv00272
Plaintiff:
Jason Duenes
Defendant:
MN Prairie County Alliance, Jane Hardwick, Erin Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jackson v. Shaft et al
as 0:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Jackson
Defendant:
Jennifer Shaft and Brandy Dropps
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
