Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Jeffery Johnson v. Jennifer Briarly, et al
as 23-5741
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEFFERY JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
JENNIFER PARKS BRIARLY, OFFICER JOANNA TIPTON, WARDEN ANNA VALENTINE and others
Park et al v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00278
Plaintiff:
Robert Russell Park, Jennifer Rose Park and Jennifer Park
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Parks v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2023cv00041
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Parks
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Johnson v. Briarly et al
as 3:2022cv00153
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Johnson
Defendant:
Jennifer Parks Briarly, Officer Tipton, Warden Anna Valentine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Odom v. Ball et al
as 5:2022cv00020
Plaintiff:
Glenn D. Odom
Defendant:
Jeremy Ball, Jennifer Parks-Burington and Ofc. Airington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gadd v. Erwin et al
as 3:2017cv00785
Plaintiff:
Owen Ray Gadd
Defendant:
Jim Erwin, Aaron Smith, Casey Dowden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yale Balcar v. Aaron Smith, et al
as 17-5131
Plaintiff - Appellant:
YALE LARRY BALCAR
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN AARON SMITH, KENTUCKY STATE REFORMATORY, All Mail Room Staff, JENNIFER PARKS, Mailroom and others
Parks et al v. AbbVie Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv05535
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Parks
Defendant:
AbbVie Inc., Abbott Laboratories, Unimed Pharmaceuticals, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Parks v. AbbVie Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00904
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Parks
Defendant:
AbbVie Inc., Abbott Laboratories, Unimed Pharmaceuticals, LLC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Parks v. Dupre Logistics, LLC et al
as 3:2015cv00072
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Parks
Defendant:
Dupre Logistics, LLC and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
