Cases 1 - 10 of 66
Eaves v. Kory, et al
as 24-1048
Plaintiff:
RODNEY DOUGLAS EAVES
Defendant:
MS. KORY, JERRY ROARK, DANNY SALAZAR and others
Lopez v. CoreCivic, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv02358
Plaintiff:
Michael Lopez
Defendant:
CoreCivic, Inc., Larry Cox, John Palomino and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Amaro v. Corizon Health, et al
as 23-2117
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PEDRO J. "PETE" AMARO
Defendant / Appellee:
CORIZON HEALTH, INC., WEXFORD HEALTH, INC., UNKNOWN DENTIST #1 and others
Eaves (PS) v. Kory et al
as 1:2023cv01627
Plaintiff:
Rodney Eaves and Rodney Douglas Eaves
Defendant:
Kory, Jerry Roark, Danny Salazar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roark v. State of Mississippi et al
as 3:2023cv00354
Plaintiff:
Jerry Roark
Defendant:
State of Mississippi, Mississippi Department of Corrections, Commisioner Burl Cain and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Eaves v. Skramsted et al
as 1:2023cv01104
Plaintiff:
Rodney Douglas Eaves
Defendant:
Skramsted, Vanessa Carson, Kory and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eaves v. Polis, et al
as 23-1143
Plaintiff / Appellee:
RODNEY DOUGLAS EAVES
Defendant / Appellant:
JARED POLIS
Defendant:
DEAN WILLIAMS, GYPSY KELSO, ANTHONY DECESARO and others
Sorensen v. Roark et al
as 1:2022cv02322
Plaintiff:
Terry Sorensen
Defendant:
Jerry Roark, Maureen Sheridan, Robert Shepard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Castillo-Rosales v. Roark et al
as 1:2021cv01930
Petitioner:
Victor Luis Castillo-Rosales
Respondent:
Jerry Roark and Philip J. Weiser
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Eaves v. Polis et al
as 1:2021cv01269
Defendant:
Marshall Griffith, Gypsy Kelso, Jerry Roark and others
Plaintiff:
Rodney Douglas Eaves
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
