Cases 1 - 10 of 59
United States of America v. Rodriguez
as 26-1931
Defendant:
RAYMOND JESSE RODRIGUEZ and Raymond Jessie Rodriguez
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cheeley v. Rodriguez
as 26-10172
Plaintiff:
Cedric Cheeley
Defendant:
Jesse Rodriguez, Jonmatthew Martinez, Adnan Shah and others
Perrotte v. Boulton, et al.
as 25-5396
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY P. PERROTTE
Defendant:
ALICE L. BOULTON, JUDITH A. VELLA, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2025cv01787
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Omar Sandoval et al v. City of Rialto et al
as 5:2025cv01879
Plaintiff:
Omar Sandoval, Linda Rodriguez, Alan Madero-Sandoval and others
Defendant:
City of Rialto, Doe Officers, Officer Martin De Shepper and others
Pretrial Service:
Richard T. Copeland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rodriguez v. Homeaglow, Inc.
as 0:2025cv60903
Plaintiff:
Jesse Rodriguez
Defendant:
Homeaglow, Inc. doing business as Dazzling Cleaning
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Rodriguez v. Homeaglow, Inc.
as 0:2025cv60902
Plaintiff:
Jesse Rodriguez
Defendant:
Homeaglow, Inc. doing business as Dazzling Cleaning
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Cheeley v. Rodriguez et al
as 3:2024cv00862
Plaintiff:
Cedric Cheeley
Defendant:
Jesse Rodriguez, Jonmatthew Martinez, Adnan Shah and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rodriguez v. Herc Rentals Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
Jesse Rodriguez
Defendant:
Herc Rentals Inc., Tyler William Hasbargen and Miguel Angel Leon, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Gomez v. New Champion Promotions, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv06608
Plaintiff:
Andy Cruz Gomez
Defendant:
New Champion Promotions, LLC, Jesse Rodriguez and Matchroom Boxing USA, LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
