Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Cooley v. Alabama Department of Mental Health
as 1:2022cv00325
Petitioner:
Jesse Cooley, Jr.
Respondent:
Alabama Department of Mental Health
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cooley v. Sam Cochran
as 1:2022cv00297
Petitioner:
Jesse Cooley, Jr.
Respondent:
Mobile Metro Jail and Sam Cochran
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cooley v. Director of Mental Health
as 1:2019cv00202
Respondent:
Director of Mental Health
Petitioner:
Jesse Cooley, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jesse Cooley, Jr. v. DOWCP, et al
as 18-60020
Petitioner:
JESSE COOLEY, JR.
Respondent:
DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and HUNTINGTON INGALLS, INCORPORATED - PASCAGOULA OPERATIONS
Jesse Cooley, Jr. v. Director, OWCP, et al
as 17-14727
Petitioner:
JESSE COOLEY, JR.
Respondent:
DIRECTOR, OWCP and HUNTINGTON INGALLS, INC. - INGALLS OPS
Jesse Cooley, Jr. v. Shelia Penn, et al
as 16-10029
Petitioner - Appellant:
JESSE COOLEY, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
SHELIA PENN and ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF ALABAMA
Jesse Cooley, Jr. v. Warden, et al
as 15-15093
Petitioner - Appellant:
JESSE COOLEY, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN and ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF ALABAMA
Cooley v. Penn et al
as 7:2015cv00971
Petitioner:
Jesse Cooley, Jr
Respondent:
Shelia Penn and The Attorney General of the State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cooley v. Alabama Department of Mental Health & Mental Retardation et al
as 7:2015cv00463
Plaintiff:
Jesse Cooley, Jr
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Mental Health & Mental Retardation and JBS Mental Health Authority
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooley v. Mobile County Department of Mental Health et al
as 1:2011cv00246
Plaintiff:
Jesse Cooley, Jr.
Defendant:
Mobile County Department of Mental Health, Mobile Infirmary Medical Center and Livingwell Health Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
