Cases 1 - 10 of 21
(PC) Liebl v. Jester et al
as 1:2023cv01131
Plaintiff:
Jesse Hans Liebl
Defendant:
David Jester and F Flores
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Liebl v. Jester et al
as 2:2023cv01459
Plaintiff:
Jesse Hans Liebl
Defendant:
David Jester and F Flores
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jesse Hernandez et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv05029
Plaintiff:
Jesse Hernandez, Luis Hernandez, Maria Hernandez and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Jester v. D.O.J. et al
as 3:2021cv07390
Petitioner:
Daniel G. Jester
Respondent:
D.O.J., A.D.A. and Government Officials
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cynthia Joan Jester v. Andrew Saul
as 2:2020cv09115
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Joan Jester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Bruno et al v. Potts et al
as 4:2017cv07225
Defendant:
Law Offices of C. Richard Potts, Jester Gibson & Moore, LLP, The Cavanaugh Law Firm and others
Plaintiff:
Joann Bruno and Paul Leonard Bruno
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
D.C. et al v. City of Antioch et al
as 3:2017cv00719
Plaintiff:
D.C., L.C., C.C. and others
Defendant:
City of Antioch, Allan Cantando and Valentino Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jester v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 4:2017cv00045
Plaintiff:
Daniel G. Jester
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and Kamala D. Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Universal Dyeing & Printing Inc v. Ambiance USA Inc et al
as 2:2016cv04262
Defendant:
Amazon.Com Inc, Ambiance USA Inc, DOES and others
Plaintiff:
Universal Dyeing & Printing Inc
Royal Printex Inc v. Jester Importing Inc et al
as 2:2016cv00540
Plaintiff:
Royal Printex Inc
Defendant:
Jester Importing Inc, K and L Wholesales Corp, Does 1 through 10 and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
