Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Brown v. Corizon Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00052
Plaintiff:
Richard F. Brown
Defendant:
Corizon Inc., Centurion Inc., Joule Stevenson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Danny Hestdalen v. Corizon Corrections HealthCare, et al
as 21-1666
Defendant / Appellee:
Dr. Ruanne Stamps, Corizon, LLC, Lisa Pogue and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Danny D. Hestdalen
Russell Hillen v. Rex Hardman, et al
as 19-3698
Defendant / Appellee:
Dr. Rex G. Hardman, Corizon Supervising Medical Director, Cherrika Buckner, Corizon Director of Nursing at TCC, Thomas Kevin Bredeman, Corizon Acting Associate Regional Medical Director and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Russell Preston Hillen
Turner v. Doerhoff et al
as 4:2019cv00626
Plaintiff:
David Turner
Defendant:
Carl R. Doerhoff, Jewel Cofield and Thomas K. Bredeman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hillen v. Hardman et al
as 2:2019cv04035
Defendant:
Jewel Cofield, Cherrika Buckner, Cheryl Beth Clad and others
Plaintiff:
Russell Preston Hillen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dennis v. Corizon LLC et al
as 2:2018cv04247
Defendant:
Dr. Epperson, Sydnee Serr, Jewel Cofield and others
Plaintiff:
Carey Dennis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mayes v. Todaro et al
as 6:2018cv03184
Plaintiff:
David Lawrence Mayes
Defendant:
Renee Todaro, Corizon Health Services, Ashok Chada and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Turner v. Cofield et al
as 5:2016cv06113
Plaintiff:
David Turner
Defendant:
Carl R. Doerhoff, Thomas K. Bredeman and Jewell Cofield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Turner v. Cofield et al
as 4:2016cv01311
Plaintiff:
David Turner
Defendant:
Carl R. Doerhoff, Thomas K. Bredeman and Jewell Cofield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lopez v. Lombardi et al
as 2:2016cv04030
Plaintiff:
Raymond Lopez
Defendant:
Jewel Cofield, Tim Bredeman, Paul Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
