Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Gregory Green v. Jimmy Richardson, II
as 24-6379
Plaintiff:
GREGORY GREEN
Defendant:
JIMMY A. RICHARDSON, II, Fifteenth Circuit Solicitor and MICHAEL TRAVIS HYMAN, Assistant Solicitor, Horry County
Green v. Richardson et al
as 4:2023cv06103
Plaintiff:
Gregory Green
Defendant:
Jimmy A. Richardson, II and Michael Travis Hyman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Dennison v. Hayes et al
as 2:2021cv02877
Plaintiff:
Carlos A Dennison
Defendant:
J Mark Hayes, Keith W Powell, Jimmy A Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bessellieu v. Bone et al
as 8:2021cv01067
Plaintiff:
Ty'shun Mario Ka'l Bessellieu
Defendant:
Shep Bone, Warden of Lee Correctional Institution, Sergeant Church and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gregory Green v. Travis Hyman
as 21-6429
Defendant / Appellee:
ALFREDO MORTELL, Warden, Manning Correctional Institution, BRYAN STERLING, Director, South Carolina Department of Corrections, TRAVIS M. HYMAN, Assistant Solicitor, Horry County and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GREGORY GREEN
Green v. Hyman et al
as 4:2020cv03100
Defendant:
Travis M. Hyman, Jimmy A. Richardson, II, Alfredo Mortell and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RICHARDSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv52565
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JIMMY LYNN RICHARDSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gregory Green v. Scott Hixson
as 19-7508
Defendant / Appellee:
JIMMY A. RICHARDSON, III, HORRY COUNTY and SCOTT RIAN HIXSON
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GREGORY GREEN
Green v. Hixson et al
as 4:2019cv01797
Plaintiff:
Gregory Green
Defendant:
Horry County, Jimmy A. Richardson, III and Scott Hixson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gregory Green v. Horry County
as 17-7327
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GREGORY GREEN
Defendant - Appellee:
HORRY COUNTY, JIMMY A. RICHARDSON, II and SCOTT HIXON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
