Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Andy Kim, et al v. Christine Hanlon, et al
as 24-1593
Plaintiff:
ANDY KIM, in his personal capacity as a candidate for U.S. Senate, ANDY KIM FOR NEW JERSEY, SARAH SCHOENGOOD and others
Defendant:
CHRISTINE G. HANLON, in her official capacity as Monmouth County Clerk, SCOTT M. COLABELLA, in his official capacity as Ocean County Clerk, PAULA SOLLAMI COVELLO, in her official capacity as Mercer County Clerk and others
Intervenor:
CAMDEN COUNTY DEMOCRATIC COMMITTEE
Andy Kim, et al v. Christine Hanlon, et al
as 24-1602
Plaintiff:
ANDY KIM, in his personal capacity as a candidate for U.S. Senate, ANDY KIM FOR NEW JERSEY, SARAH SCHOENGOOD and others
Defendant:
CHRISTINE G. HANLON, in her official capacity as Monmouth County Clerk, SCOTT M. COLABELLA, in his official capacity as Ocean County Clerk, PAULA SOLLAMI COVELLO, in her official capacity as Mercer County Clerk and others
Intervenor:
CAMDEN COUNTY DEMOCRATIC COMMITTEE
Andy Kim, et al v. Christine Hanlon, et al
as 24-1601
Plaintiff:
ANDY KIM, in his personal capacity as a candidate for U.S. Senate, ANDY KIM FOR NEW JERSEY, SARAH SCHOENGOOD and others
Defendant:
CHRISTINE G. HANLON, in hr official capacity as Monmouth County Clerk, SCOTT M. COLABELLA, in his official capacity as Ocean County Clerk, PAULA SOLLAMI COVELLO, in her official capacity as Mercer County Clerk and others
Intervenor:
CAMDEN COUNTY DEMOCRATIC COMMITTEE
Andy Kim, et al v. Christine Hanlon, et al
as 24-1594
Plaintiff:
ANDY KIM, in his personal capacity as a candidate for U.S. Senate, ANDY KIM FOR NEW JERSEY, SARAH SCHOENGOOD and others
Defendant:
SCOTT M. COLABELLA, in his official capacity as Ocean County Clerk, PAULA SOLLAMI COVELLO, in her official capacity as Mercer County Clerk, MARY H. MELFI, in her capacity as Hunterdon County Clerk and others
Intervenor:
CAMDEN COUNTY DEMOCRATIC COMMITTEE
KIM et al v. HANLON et al
as 3:2024cv01098
Plaintiff:
ANDY KIM, ANDY KIM FOR NEW JERSEY, SARAH SCHOENGOOD and others
Defendant:
CHRISTINE GIORDANO HANLON, SCOTT M. COLABELLA, PAULA SOLLAMI COVELLO and others
Intervenor:
LAURA ALI, JOSE ARANGO, New Jersey Republican Chairs Association and others
Amicus Curiae:
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF NEW JERSEY, Election Law Clinic at Harvard Law School, Asian American Legal Defense and Education Fund and others
Interested Party:
DALE CROSS, JEFF PARROTT and TAHESHA WAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Benjamin Woodhouse v. United States Government, et al
as 22-55636
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BENJAMIN WOODHOUSE, A Citizen of the United States, Resident of the U.S. Virgin Islands
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, STANLEY BLUMENFELD, Jr., US District Court Judge, R. GARY KLAUSNER, United States District Court Judge and others
Benjamin Woodhouse, et al v. United States Government, et al
as 22-55598
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BENJAMIN WOODHOUSE, A Citizen of the United States, Resident of the U.S. Virgin Islands and HAVENSIGHT CAPITAL L.L.C., a U.S. Virgin Islands corporation
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, STANLEY BLUMENFELD, Jr., US District Court Judge, GIBSON DUNN, INC., A California Corporation and others
Benjamin Woodhouse, et al v. United States Government, et al
as 22-55463
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BENJAMIN WOODHOUSE, A Citizen of the United States, Resident of the U.S. Virgin Islands and HAVENSIGHT CAPITAL L.L.C., a U.S. Virgin Islands corporation
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, STANLEY BLUMENFELD, Jr., US District Court Judge, GIBSON DUNN, INC., A California Corporation and others
GITTENS v. SCHOLTZ et al
as 1:2018cv02519
Plaintiff:
DARIUS GITTENS
Defendant:
MILDRED SCHOLTZ, MATTHEW LEITH, W. MCDONNELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TUCKER v. THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2015cv06808
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH CORNELIUS TUCKER
Defendant:
THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, BAYSIDE PRISON, JOHN POWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
