Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Paixao v. City of Greenwood et al
as 4:2023cv00047
Plaintiff:
Brenda Paixao
Defendant:
City of Greenwood, County of Leflore, Greenwood Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pinkston v. Lee et al
as 5:2022cv00018
Plaintiff:
Chaz Pinkston
Defendant:
Larry Lee, George Castro, Gabriel Walker and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pinkston v. Reeves et al
as 5:2020cv00167
Defendant:
Tommy Taylor, Delando Miles, Larry Lee and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Chaz Pinkston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Bradley et al
as 5:2020cv00039
Defendant:
Dr. Walker, Pelicia Hall, Ms. Toomey and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Smith
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Bradley et al
as 5:2020cv00037
Defendant:
Warden Jody Bradley, Deputy Warden T. Daniels (Toomey) and Mississippi Department of Corrections
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Paul Warren Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cook v. Bradley
as 5:2018cv00126
Defendant:
Jody Bradley
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Cody Cook and Coby Cook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cook v. Bradley
as 3:2018cv00236
Defendant:
Warden Jody Bradley
Plaintiff:
Cody Cook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Pinkston v. Hall et al
as 5:2018cv00103
Defendant:
Larry Lee, Jerry Williams, C/O C. Hughey and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Chaz D. Pinkston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Laneri v. Hall et al
as 1:2018cv00306
Plaintiff:
Henry J. Laneri, III
Defendant:
Jody Bradley, Pelica Hall and Pelicia Hall
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith v. Bradley et al
as 4:2018cv00192
Plaintiff:
Charles Smith
Defendant:
Pelicia Hall, Mr. Turner, Warden Toomey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
