Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Jones et al v. Livingston et al
as 4:2017cv02335
Plaintiff:
Roy Jones , Alice Jones and Lequetta Davis
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, Matt Barber, Joe A. Grimes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miles v. Grimes
as 4:2013cv00345
Petitioner:
Billy Rell Miles
Respondent:
Joe A Grimes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Purdy v. Gimes
as 4:2012cv00119
Respondent:
Joe D. Grimes
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
Bud Purdy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vernon King, Jr. v. Brad Livingston, et al
as 10-20539
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VERNON KING, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
BRAD LIVINGSTON, BRENDA CHANEY, JOE A. GRIMES and others
King v. Livingston et al
as 4:2010cv02225
Plaintiff:
Vernon King, Jr
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, Brenda Chaney, Joe A. Grimes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vernon King, Jr. v. Brad Livingston, et al
as 10-20359
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VERNON KING, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
BRAD LIVINGSTON, Executive Director, BRENDA CHANEY, Senior Warden, TODD E HARRIS and others
Vernon King, Jr. v. Brad Livingston, et al
as 10-20157
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VERNON KING, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
BRAD LIVINGSTON, Executive Director, BRENDA CHANEY, Senior Warden, TODD E HARRIS and others
King v. Livingston et al
as 4:2010cv00238
Plaintiff:
Vernon King, Jr
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, Brenda Chaney, Todd E Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Noble v. Grimes et al
as 2:2009cv00030
Plaintiff:
Reginald Arleigh Noble
Defendant:
Joe A Grimes, Brian J Clerk, Levin W Fuller and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Phillips v. Wilbur et al
as 2:2008cv00225
Plaintiff:
Matthew Phillips
Defendant:
Kemph L Wilbur, Isaac R Arzola, Douglas Dretke and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
