Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 31
Joe Browder, Jr. v. Ky State Prison Officials, et al
as 13-6659
Plaintiff - Appellant: JOE ALEXANDER BROWDER, JR.
Defendant - Appellee: KENTUCKY STATE PRISON OFFICIALS, John Does and Jane Does, PHILLIP PARKER, Warden, JOHN DOE, President of Correctcare Integrated Health, Inc. and others
Joe Browder, Jr. v. Cookie Crew
as 13-6274
Petitioner - Appellant: JOE ALEXANDER BROWDER, JR.
Respondent - Appellee: COOKIE CREWS, Warden
Joe Browder, Jr. v. Nancy Ankrom, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-6428
Plaintiff - Appellant: JOE ALEXANDER BROWDER, JR.
Defendant - Appellee: NANCY ANKROM, SARA ESTES and TAMMY BUCHANAN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00999
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
ALEXANDER v. THE CELOTEX CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv63737
Plaintiff: WILLIE JOE ALEXANDER
Defendant: THE CELOTEX CORPORATION , GAF CORPORATION , OWENS CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In Re: Joe Browder, Jr.
as 10-6461
Petitioner: In re: JOE ALEXANDER BROWDER, JR.
Alexander v. State Farm Lloyds -
as 3:2010cv00508
Defendant: State Farm Lloyds
Plaintiff: Joe Alexander
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Type: Contract Insurance
Joe Browder, Jr. v. Scott Haas, et al
as 10-6170
Plaintiff - Appellant: JOE ALEXANDER BROWDER, JR.
Defendant - Appellee: SCOTT HAAS, Medical Director and MEDICAL DIRECTOR, KY State Prison
Defendant: MICHAEL FAIRCHILD and DIRECTOR VA MEDICAL CENTER
Joe Browder, Jr. v. Phillip Parker, et al
as 10-6145
Petitioner - Appellant: JOE ALEXANDER BROWDER, JR.
Respondent - Appellee: PHILLIP PARKER, Warden and COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00292
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?