Cases 1 - 10 of 233
Cole v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2019cv05773
Defendant:
Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, Joe Arpaio and Vincent Companaro
Plaintiff:
Marcquiese Jamall Cole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Colson v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2019cv05585
Defendant:
Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, Paul Penzone, Vincent Companaro and others
Plaintiff:
Shawn Douglas Colson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lesaine v. Penzone et al
as 2:2019cv05478
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, Vincent Companaro and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lesaine
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Helsel v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2019cv05447
Defendant:
Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, Paul Penzone, Vincent Companaro and others
Plaintiff:
Deven Drew Helsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wax v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2019cv05448
Defendant:
Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, Paul Penzone, Joe Arpaio and others
Plaintiff:
Arlin Lloyd Wax
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barker v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2019cv05408
Defendant:
Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, Paul Penzone, Joe Arpaio and others
Plaintiff:
Gary Todd Barker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mendivil v. Penzone et al
as 2:2019cv05412
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, Joe Arpaio and others
Plaintiff:
Johnny Lee Mendivil
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richmond v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2019cv05202
Defendant:
Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, Luna Figueroa, Joe Arpaio and others
Plaintiff:
James Richmond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hood v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2019cv05208
Defendant:
Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, Joe Arpaio and Vincent Companaro
Plaintiff:
Kangata Damasi Hood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nash v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2019cv05055
Defendant:
Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, Vincent Companaro and Joe Arpaio
Plaintiff:
Robert Christopher Nash
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
