Cases 21 - 30 of 37
Johnson v. Walgreens et al
as 6:2022cv00087
Plaintiff:
Clarence D. Johnson and Nehemiah H&G Construction
Defendant:
Walgreens, CVS, Rite-Aid and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Johnson v. Biden et al
as 6:2022cv00038
Plaintiff:
Clarence D. Johnson
Defendant:
George Bush, Sr., Joe Biden, Donald Trump and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fourstar v. Secretary of Health and Human Services et al
as 1:2022cv00065
Plaintiff:
Victor Charles Fourstar, Jr.
Defendant:
Unknown Surgeons and Physicians at Swedish Medical Center, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Angie Wagner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brass v. Biden et al
as 1:2021cv02778
Plaintiff:
Brian Brass
Defendant:
Joe Biden and Gina Raimondo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garcia v. Biden, et al
as 21-1293
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MIGUEL ANTONIO GARCIA
Defendant / Appellee:
JOE BIDEN, JAMES ANDERSON, CLARK SMITH and others
Fourstar v. Biden, et al
as 21-1292
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VICTOR CHARLES FOURSTAR, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
JOE BIDEN, MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS UNKNOWN HEADS, MICHAEL CARVAJAL, Director of Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
De La O v. White House et al
as 2:2021cv00799
Plaintiff:
Paul Mark De La O, Jr.
Defendant:
White House and Joe Biden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fourstar v. Biden, et al
as 21-1314
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VICTOR CHARLES FOURSTAR, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
JOE BIDEN, MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS UNKNOWN HEADS, MICHAEL CARVAJAL, Director of Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Sharp v. Biden
as 1:2021cv00719
Plaintiff:
Tommy Sharp and Donald Thomas Sharp
Defendant:
Joe Biden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oblad v. United States Government, et al
as 21-4094
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRIAN OBLAD
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, ATTORNEY GENERALS UTAH, NANCY PELOSI, Speaker of the House and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
