Cases 11 - 20 of 82
Darrell Parks v. Cranston Mitchell, et al
as 11-5358
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Darrell James Parks
Defendant - Appellee:
Cranston J. Mitchell, Chairman of United States Parole Commission, Patricia K. Cushwa, Chairman of United States Parole Commission, Isaac Fulwood, Jr., Chairman of United States Parole Commission and others
Washington v. Driver
as 1:2011cv00016
Plaintiff:
Aaron Washington
Defendant:
Joe Driver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bourn et al v. Geo Group Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv02628
Plaintiff:
Worden Bourn and Charles Greenlee
Defendant:
Geo Group Inc., Joe Driver, Ron Murray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cleveland v. Driver
as 3:2011cv00171
Plaintiff:
Steven Cleveland
Defendant:
Joe Driver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kenneth William Ray, II v. Joe Driver et al
as 11-6164
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH WILLIAM RAY, II
Defendant - Appellee:
JOE DRIVER, Rec Officer, HAROLD BOYLES and MICHELLE T. FUSEYAMORE, Regional Counsel
Trevis Caldwell v. Harley Lappin
as 10-7758
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TREVIS PAUL CALDWELL
Defendant - Appellee:
HARLEY G. LAPPIN, B.O.P. Director, WARDEN CROSS, JOE DRIVER, former Warden, USP Hazelton and others
Freddie Francis, Jr. v. Lt. Petrisko
as 10-7738
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDDIE FRANCIS, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
LT. PETRISKO, JOE DRIVER, Warden, C.O. BAKER and others
Pinson v. Keffer et al
as 5:2010cv01229
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Vaughn Pinson
Defendant:
Joe Keffer, John Fox, Sarah Revell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bobby Hazel v. Harley Lappin
as 10-6628
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BOBBY HAZEL
Defendant - Appellee:
HARLEY G. LAPPIN, Director, United States Bureau of Prisons, JOE DRIVER, CAPTAIN BOYLES, Administrator and others
Bobby Hazel v. Harley Lappin
as 10-6202
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BOBBY HAZEL
Defendant - Appellee:
HARLEY G. LAPPIN, Director, United States Bureau of Prisons, JOE DRIVER, CAPTAIN BOYLES, Administrator and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
