Cases 31 - 40 of 166
Houston v. L.B.B.S. et al
as 2:2022cv01780
Plaintiff:
Matthew Travis Houston
Defendant:
L.B.B.S., Daniel Schwartz, Calvin Johnson and others
Houston v. Lombardo et al
as 2:2022cv01748
Plaintiff:
Matthew Travis Houston
Defendant:
Sheriff Joe Lombardo, Carolyn Goodman, Miranda M. Du and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Houston v. Lombardo et al
as 2:2022cv01685
Plaintiff:
Matthew Travis Houston
Defendant:
Sheriff Joe Lombardo, Carolyn Goodman, Miranda M. Du and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Houston v. Lombardo et al
as 2:2022cv01607
Plaintiff:
Matthew Travis Houston
Defendant:
Joe Lombardo, Carolyn Goodman, Miranda M. Du and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Lombardo et al
as 2:2022cv01369
Plaintiff:
Scott Allan Jones
Defendant:
Sheriff Clark County Joeseph Lomardo, Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, Neighborhood Watch Communities and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Bailey v. Henderson Police Department, et al.
as 2:2022cv01211
Plaintiff:
Michael Bailey
Defendant:
City of Henderson, Nevada, Henderson Police Department, Thedrick Andres and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Campbell v. Las Vegas Metro Police Department et al
as 2:2022cv00944
Plaintiff:
Karen L. Campbell
Defendant:
Las Vegas Metro Police Department, City of Las Vegas, Joe Lombardo and others
Julius Bradford v. Calvin Johnson, et al
as 22-15792
Petitioner / Appellant:
JULIUS BRADFORD
Respondent / Appellee:
CALVIN JOHNSON and JOE LOMBARDO, Sheriff
Matthew Houston v. Calvin Johnson, et al
as 22-15748
Petitioner / Appellant:
MATTHEW TRAVIS HOUSTON
Respondent / Appellee:
CALVIN JOHNSON and SHERIFF JOE LOMBARDO
Jackson v. Sheriff Joe Lombardo et al
as 2:2022cv00705
Petitioner:
Emanuel Pedro Jackson
Respondent:
Sheriff Joe Lombardo and Attorney General State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
