Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Goins v. Norwood et al
as 2:2018cv04223
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Arizona and Joe Norwood
Petitioner:
Robert Carlton Goins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brinkman v. Ryan et al
as 4:2018cv00380
Defendant:
Roland Buchanan, Gloria Gethier, Unknown Lopez and others
Plaintiff:
Albert L Brinkman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kenneth Alexander v. USA, et al
as 12-55930
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH S. ALEXANDER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellee:
JESUS FERNANDEZ, MD, FCI Victorville 1, LILIA CASTILLO, P.A., VICTORIA MALINGKAS, P.A. and others
Clemente Perez Luna v. USA, et al
as 09-56075
Petitioner - Appellant:
CLEMENTE PEREZ LUNA
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Respondent:
JOE NORWOOD, Warden
Joe Louis Simpkins v. United States of America et al
as 2:2009cv02465
Plaintiff:
Joe Louis Simpkins, II
Defendant:
United States of America, Joe Norwood, Unkown Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Ismael Garcia v. Joe Norwood
as 2:2008cv04293
Petitioner:
Ismael Garcia
Respondent:
Joe Norwood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
James McKines v. Joe Norwood
as 08-55450
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES ALBERT MCKINES
Respondent - Appellee:
JOE NORWOOD, Warden
James Albert McKines v. Joe Norwood
as 2:2007cv07226
Petitioner:
James Albert McKines
Respondent:
Joe Norwood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
LaFayette Demetrius Boyle v. Joe Norwood
as 2:2007cv05888
Plaintiff:
Lafayette Demetrius Boyle
Defendant:
Joe Norwood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
LaFayette Demetrius Boyle v. Joe Norwood
as 2:2007cv05124
Petitioner:
Lafayette Demetrius Boyle
Respondent:
Joe Norwood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
