Cases 1 - 10 of 37
BASCETTA et al v. VISION SOLAR, LLC
as 1:2023cv02010
Plaintiff:
TOM BASCETTA, AR-RAHMAN BUSKEY, SANDRA CUENCA and others
Defendant:
VISION SOLAR, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00011
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Theresa Dukes v. Eric Cox, et al
as 15-2783
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THERESA L. DUKES
Defendant - Appellee:
ERIC COX, Sergeant, Johnson County Sheriff's Deputy, JOE SCHMIDT, Johnson County Sheriff's Deputy and JEFF SEGO, Indiana State Police Trooper
Theresa Dukes v. Eric Cox, et al
as 15-2783
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THERESA L. DUKES
Defendant / Appellee:
ERIC COX, Sergeant, Johnson County Sheriff's Deputy, JOE SCHMIDT, Johnson County Sheriff's Deputy and JEFF SEGO, Indiana State Police Trooper
Williamson v. Schmidt et al
as 3:2014cv00219
Plaintiff:
Thor J. Williamson
Defendant:
Joe Schmidt, Tomi Anderson, Earl Houser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adkins v. Schmidt et al
as 1:2014cv02454
Plaintiff:
Chet Harvey Adkins
Defendant:
Joe Schmidt, Joe (I) Schmidt, Christopher Pagel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adkins v. Schmidt et al
as 3:2014cv00162
Plaintiff:
Chet Harvey Adkins
Defendant:
Joe Schmidt, Christopher Pagel and Joe D. Driver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ball v. State of Alaska Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2014cv00137
Plaintiff:
Robert Ball
Defendant:
State of Alaska Department of Corrections, Joe Schmidt, Tomi Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00127
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanderson v. Schmidt et al
as 3:2014cv00053
Plaintiff:
James Sanderson
Defendant:
Joe Schmidt, Debbie Miller, Michael Boothe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
