Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Shields v. Reliant Capital Solutions LLC
as 4:2026cv04626
Plaintiff:
Joe Shields
Defendant:
Reliant Capital Solutions LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Shields v. Branson et al
as 4:2026cv04625
Plaintiff:
Joe Shields
Defendant:
Sally Harris Branson, Randal Luther Hale, Joseph Dominick Matranga and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Shields v. O'Rourke et al
as 3:2022cv00356
Plaintiff:
Joe Shields
Defendant:
Robert Francis O'Rourke, Beto For Texas and Toskr Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00018
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Shields v. Elevated Energy Solutions LLC et al
as 3:2019cv00390
Defendant:
TriSmart Solar LLC, Elevated Energy Solutions LLC, Apex Lead Media PVT LTD and others
Plaintiff:
Joe Shields
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Carthen v. Gonzalez et al
as 1:2019cv06392
Defendant:
John Doe, Hilary Gingold, Juana Ortiz and others
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Laval Carthen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Joe Shields v. Gawk, Incorporated, et al
as 19-40557
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOE SHIELDS
Defendant / Appellee:
SCOTT KETTLE, Individually and KENNEDY WEAVER, Individually
Shields v. Mutual of Omaha Marketing Corporation et al
as 4:2019cv00805
Plaintiff:
Joe Shields
Defendant:
TZ Insurance Solutions LLC and Mutual of Omaha Marketing Corporation
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Shields v. Gawk Inc et al
as 3:2018cv00150
Plaintiff:
Joe Shields
Defendant:
Scott Kettle, Kennedy Weaver and Gawk Inc
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Shields v. Golden Ticket Getaways, Inc et al
as 4:2017cv01813
Defendant:
BPCL Management LLC, James Verrillo, Clement Scantlebury and others
Plaintiff:
Joe Shields
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
