Cases 1 - 8 of 8
TYSON v. COINBASE GLOBAL, INC. et al
as 1:2023cv22066
Plaintiff:
Sydney Tyson
Defendant:
COINBASE GLOBAL, INC., JOHN DOE, JANE DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
CARR v. COUNTY OF CAMDEN et al
as 1:2022cv03698
Plaintiff:
URSULA CARR
Defendant:
COUNTY CAMDEN, OFFICER SAMSON #1000, SERGEANT JANE DOE 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MORALES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2021cv12138
Defendant:
COUNTY OF CAMDEN, JOHN/JANE DOE 1, JOHN/JANE DOES 2-10 and others
Plaintiff:
NATASHA MORALES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
KWANZAA v. TELL et al
as 1:2019cv20373
Defendant:
OFFICER JOHN/JANE DOE #1, OFFICER JOHN/JANE DOE #2, RYAN VAN SYKLE and others
Plaintiff:
PEGGY BOLER KWANZAA and LAMONT SCOTT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAKER v. CAMARILLO et al
as 3:2017cv12095
Plaintiff:
SCOTT BAKER
Defendant:
JOY CAMARILLO, IHUOMA NWACHUKWU, UNIVERSITY BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CARE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
WHEELER et al v. JERSEY CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2012cv07528
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL WHEELER and CARVISSA WHEELER
Defendant:
JERSEY CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT , MICHAEL MEADE , MARK HENNESSY and others
Cross_claimant:
N. MONTANEZ
Cross_defendant:
N. MONTANEZ , B. CULLINAN , MARK HENNESSY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MOORE v. CUCCHI et al
as 3:2009cv02217
Plaintiff:
JON PAUL MOORE
Defendant:
EDMOND CUCCHI, JOYCE PIRRE, DR. ANDERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
OSHAUGHNESSY v. WALMART STORES, INC. et al
as 1:2007cv00960
Plaintiff:
SANDRA L. OSHAUGHNESSY
Defendant:
WALMART STORES, INC., WALMART STORES, INC., JOHN/JANE DOE #1 and others
Cross Claimant:
WALMART STORES, INC.
Cross Defendant:
JOHN/JANE DOE #1 and JOHN/JANE DOES 2-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
